The gradar solution
With rosetta, QPM’s edition of the Rosetta Stone, we publish a free, fully revised and extended new release of this tool – rosetta is our investment in more quality in the survey landscape. Participation in compensation surveys typically is done by matching the own business’s positions to
1. benchmark positions or to
2. a survey level in combination with the functional match of a job family and possibly sub-family or discipline.
To find the common ground between the various providers, we have evaluated their levelling methodologies with our job evaluation system gradar the job evaluation engine. This is how we can provide a reliable read across table.
On especially the level of top management, however, it is not possible to deliver accurate comparisons, since here the evaluation criteria differ strongly (from analytical job evaluations to hybrid forms to scaling according to financial KPIs of organisations).
Providers & labour agreements
The overview rosetta provides orientation for comparing gradar grades with grades from reward and pay surveys of the following providers as well as from following labour agreements:
- AON/Hewitt
- Birches Group
- Culpepper
- Hay
- H.E.R.A.
- HCM/HRIS
- salary.com IPAS
- Landolt & Mächler JobTax
- Lurse
- Paterson
- Pearl Meyer
- PEROMNES
- Radford
- Sedlak & Sedlak
- Western Management Group
- CATS (Netherlands)
- FWG (Netherlands)
- Labour agreement banking (Germany)
- Labour agreement chemical industry Nordrhein (Germany)
- Labour agreement whole sale and international trade NRW (Germany)
- Labour agreement metal and electronic industries (ERA) (Germany)
- Public services and municipal utilities (Germany)
Open, transparent, clear
Download rosetta, our free, fully revised and extended decoding of levelling methodologies from compensation studies and labour agreements.
Format: .xlsx (Excel) Dateigröße: 172 KB